Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Lead states compete for influence and followers, and to this end, the provision of health aid is a crucial foreign policy tool. Yet, there is variation in the means and patterns of provision. How and to which countries do providing states distribute aid amidst global health crisis and great power rivalry? Moreover, why are certain provision strategies pursued over or in combination with others? This article posits a novel typology of strategies: preserving existing partnerships, pressuring opponents, protecting recipients based on need, and peeling off countries from geopolitical rivals. It then analyzes US and Chinese vaccine distribution throughout the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to such strategies. Regression results and Bayesian process tracing suggest the US approach is characterized by protecting and peeling, while the Chinese approach is a combination of pressuring, preserving, and protecting. As for why certain provision strategies are pursued over others, evidence from original interviews and case studies of Nicaragua and Paraguay suggest grand strategic considerations take precedent over dyadic geopolitical calculations or domestic special interests.