Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
When do parties iniate investigations, and when do they stay silent? I use formal theory to understand when and why Senate investigations happen, given that parties have options to share information with each other. In the model, two players want different outcomes on an issue. They can either initiate an investigation to find out the true state of the world or stay silent on the issue. Importantly, they have an option to decide whether or not to share their signals beforehand. I find that parties prefer to learn from each other despite having opposite preferences when the signals they receive are sufficiently biased. I further deduce comparative statics on conditions under which investigations take place.