Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Following the Russian influence campaign in the 2016 United States presidential elections, concerns over cyber-enabled information operations have intensified in the country. Officials and analysts have warned that the U.S. needs a clear and cohesive set of policies and strategies to counter this type of operation. Despite the importance of this topic, we know little about why the United States has struggled with the formulation of a cyber policy to counter cyber-enabled foreign information operations. I argue that the convergence of different policy coalitions toward a shared cybersecurity narrative explains this policy failure. This narrative drew the attention of target audiences to hardware and software exploitation instead of information manipulation. Using computational text analysis, I examine a corpus of congressional hearings to investigate how policy narratives about cybersecurity threats were constructed in the United States between 1990 and 2016. The available evidence suggests that these narratives have a path-dependence effect on how actors define cybersecurity threats and set the foreign-policy agenda toward this issue.