Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Roundtable
Interpretivism centers on examining processes of meaning-making and highlights the situatedness of knowledge. This broad, pluralistic, and expanding tradition has long offered rich insights across the social sciences and posed challenges to positivist assumptions of objectivity and universality. This roundtable unites interpretive political science scholars of different ranks and from different subfields to explore areas of interpretivist political science and reflect on its impact on the discipline. Participants in the roundtable are contributors to the Oxford Handbook of Methodological Pluralism, edited by Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Valeria Sinclair-Chapman, and Dino Christenson. The roundtable will examine the ontological assumptions of interpretivist research, explore how these commitments shape the practice of research, and survey some of the rich contributions of interpretive approaches to the discipline of political science. The latter includes reflecting on digital interpretivist approaches, the diversity of comparison in the discipline, dynamics of discourse analysis, and reflexivity in the production of knowledge. Collectively, this roundtable makes the broader argument that political scientists need to be more aware of the ontological assumptions embedded in the methodological choices they make, as these assumptions shape the kinds of knowledge that are produced and not produced in political science research. By being aware of these assumptions and both valuing and understanding the varied methodological approaches and tools that arise from different ontological commitments, political science as a discipline can move toward pluralism and inclusivity.