Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Communication is central to U.S. public diplomacy, and much research has focused on the type and content of messages that are most effective in changing foreign public opinion. However, diplomatic communication officers often receive inconsistent messaging recommendations from different offices in the State Department. How does this process contribute to a diplomat’s public messaging decisions? Using a principal-agent framework, we theorize that communication officers will be more likely to implement their preferred message when various principals within the government offer conflict instructions. In collaboration with the State Department, we propose a research design to test this with a survey experiment on a wide set of diplomatic officers stationed around the globe. This study will allow for a greater understanding of how bureaucratic politics affect a state’s ability to engage in coherent public diplomacy.