Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Congressional candidates use Twitter to connect with voters, and political stalemates over inflation, reproductive rights, and the lasting impact of Trump politics are bolstering candidates’ emotionally charged rhetoric on Twitter. In a political environment where one tweet can set off a firestorm, the power of anger to spread rapidly and virally has made frustrated and fear-inducing rhetoric the norm for congressional campaigns. We use a dataset of tweets by candidates for the U.S. House from 2016-2022 to determine the escalating anger in the emotional appeals candidates make on Twitter. We find differences in angry rhetoric across party, gender, and electoral security — patterns that persist over time. Our research offers insight into how anger has become central to online messaging.