Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Studies show that peers affect individual’s academic outcome. Yet, research less often scrutinizes how peer dynamics vary by academic achievement. Drawing on ethnography in two elite and a non-elite high schools with identical curricula and in the same educational track, this study investigates peer dynamics between students’ with different levels of academic performances. Specifically, I examine peer reactions to public shaming and praising based on students’ test results. I find that, while shaming and praising similarly occurred in both schools, elite and non-elite students exhibited differently reacted to shame and praise. Elite students actively shamed peers by dramatizing the mistakes made, but showed minimal response to praise based on academic achievement. Non-elite students avoided taking part in peer shaming, but enthusiastically congratulated peers who were praised. By comparing students’ different (even opposite) reactions to comparable academic evaluations, this paper argues that peer dynamics affect adolescents’ schooling experiences by shaping student experiences of academic achievement.