Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Are all transnational exchanges “fielded”? This article explores the usefulness and the limits of the concept of transnational field by focusing on the case of online journalism. At first glance, online news might seem to be the perfect example of a transnational field. The frequency of international exchanges between media outlets has increased dramatically with the development of news websites, leading media scholars to develop the concept of “global news.” Yet such international exchanges do not necessarily constitute a field.
Using ethnographic methods, I analyze the circulation of online content between the United States and France, two countries with strikingly different journalistic traditions. Specifically, I compare two editorial partnerships between U.S. and French websites, one linking prestigious online magazines across the Atlantic and the other connecting tabloid-oriented news sites. In both cases, editorial content did not circulate seamlessly between the two countries. Based on these case studies, the article proposes three criteria that must be met for transnational fields to exist: competition over the legitimate definition of the field; reciprocal field effects; and the existence of common material stakes.