Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Drawing on comparative ethnographic data collected during three years of participant observation, I compare social movement organizing among Mexican immigrant communities in two cities in one California county: one more progressive and the other more repressive. Classic studies in the social movement literature associate growing political opportunity—or the signals in the broader environment that encourage or discourage social movement activity—with the emergence of collective mobilization. Building on more recent scholarship that has problematized classic conceptualizations of political opportunity by examining threat and the perception of threat. I argue that threatening political conditions do not necessarily dampen collective mobilization; instead, they give it shape. Organizers working within social movement organizations (SMOs) try to alter immigrants perception of threat by stressing their shared destiny, not because immigrants need to be convinced that threats exist, but to come to see them as actionable. When organizers are able to convince potential immigrant activists of the value and efficacy of collective action, mobilization emerges. The shape that mobilization takes—more contentious or more collaborative—depends on the local political conditions in which these struggles unfold.