Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
This study analyzes levels and patterns of cross-cultural variability in two categories of human rights: bodily integrity, encompassing protection from torture, extrajudicial killing, and other forms of physical repression; and civil liberties, including the freedoms of expression, assembly, movement, and religion. Countries are delineated into 13 cultural zones based primarily on predominant religious tradition and secondarily on geographical region. The core hypothesis predicts that respect for bodily integrity rights, which seek to protect biological beings from physical harm, varies less across cultures than respect for civil liberties, which empower social and cultural entities to be self-determining agents. Individuals’ capacity for pain and suffering is thought to be universal, but conceptions of the bounded and autonomous actor are culturally constructed and hence variable across cultures. Statistical analyses support this hypothesis: compared with civil liberties scores, cross-cultural variation in bodily integrity scores is much lower and also less durable in the presence of control variables. Moreover, whereas civil liberties scores are much higher in Western countries than in the rest of the world, cross-cultural variability in bodily integrity scores is gradational rather than polarized.