Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
Academia has been described as a durable caste system of inequality where faculty members’ career prospects are deeply circumscribed by the prestige of the department where they received their doctoral degree. Despite what we know about the hierarchical nature of academia, however, one crucial question remains unanswered: for whom is academia more of a caste system? Using a network analytic approach, I examine if the effect of academic prestige hierarchies varies by professorial rank and gender across four disciplines: Business, Computer Science, History, and Sociology. On the basis of rigorous statistical models I find (1) US News is a far superior predictor of placements than NRC rankings, (2) Sociology is more status conscious than other disciplines, (3) Women, especially in Computer Science and Business, are much more beholden to the prestige of their academic degree than men, (4) Full male professors are least vulnerable to the prestige of their doctoral degree. By comparison, full female professors’ jobs are closely connected to the reputation of their degree-granting department.