Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
While social movement organizations often work in alliance with other groups, relatively little has been written about coalitions that are intentionally limited and short-term in nature. In this study, I begin to address this gap in the literature through analysis of one case, the successful campaign to defeat Idaho’s Propositions 1, 2, and 3 in 2012. The campaign brought together the Idaho Education Association—the state’s K-12 education workers’ union—and Idaho Parents and Teachers Together, an organization made up of community members who opposed the new education reform laws. The short-term, limited nature of this alliance allowed for strategic separation between organizations, which provided some immunity from opponents’ arguments, lessened the costs of entering into a partnership, and promoted broad-based framing of shared claims and goals. I call for further research on such limited coalitions, since findings could have applications for both scholars and activists.