Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
We inductively devised two ontologies to describe scientific uncertainty in food safety risk assessments. We ask three questions. 1. Can we use Machine Learning to assist with coding complex documents such as food safety risk assessments on a difficult topic like scientific uncertainty? 2. Can we assess using ML the quality of the ontologies we devised? 3. And, finally, does the quality of our ontologies depend on social factors? We found that ML can do surprisingly well in its simplest form identifying complex meanings, and it does not benefit from adding certain types of complexity to the analysis. Our ML experiments show that in one ontology which is a simple typology, against expectations, semantic opposites attract each other, and support the taxonomic structure of the other. And finally, we found some evidence that institutional factors do influence how well our taxonomy of uncertainty performs but its ability to capture meaning does not vary greatly across the time, institutional context and cultures we investigated.