Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Main Menu (Submission Site)
Sign Out
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Compared to people who report being paid appropriately, do those who perceive under-reward report higher levels of depressive symptoms, physical health symptoms, and anger? And, more importantly, how does socioeconomic status—as measured by education and income—moderate any observed associations? Using data from a nationally representative sample of American workers from diverse occupations, sectors, and social statuses, I test two hypotheses that articulate those contingencies: buffering-resource and status-disconfirmation. Results for income support the buffering-resource hypothesis, such that the relationship between perceived under-reward and three measures of distress are weaker among those with higher income. The patterns for education, however, suggest support for both hypotheses: higher education buffers the effect of slight underpayment on the three distress outcomes, but does not buffer the effect of severe underpayment. I discuss the way these findings integrate theories from the sociology of stress and distributive justice in an effort to better describe emotional inequality in the population.