Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Main Menu (Submission Site)
Sign Out
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Sociology has yet to see an intense and sustained interrogation of the kind of writing it produces and tacitly endorses. Meanwhile, the academic English found in contemporary sociological writing and the literary forms these writings take are demonstrable relics of positivism. Creating a body of scholarship that thoroughly moves away from a positivist philosophy of science, let alone formulates a synthetic approach that bridges the nomothetic/idiographic divide—the broad project of historical social science—requires interrogating not just the content of sociological knowledge but the form in which that knowledge is expressed, which itself embodies theory. Using examples from the history of philosophy along with historical and rhetorical accounts of social science, this paper makes the case for historical sociology’s integration of a concern for writing and literary form into its integrative theoretical project.