Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Historical sociology is famously divided, theoretically, methodologically, and substantively. What then binds the field together as a coherent “thing”? In this paper we explore two possibilities: that the field is unified by a shared canon, whether empirical or theoretical; and that a concrete social network, whether centered around concrete institutions or an “invisible college” of interlocutors, binds historical sociology together. Using a variety of data, we find strong support for the existence of a historical comparative canon, as well as suggestive evidence of a weak institutional and interpersonal network binding the field.