Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Higher education has long functioned as a central mechanism for sorting individuals into unequal positions in elite labor markets. Extensive scholarship documents the labor market returns to degree level, field of study, and institutional prestige, as well as the role of education as a signal under conditions of uncertainty. Yet less attention has been paid to how industries themselves define and assemble qualification at the point of recruitment — particularly how educational credentials operate alongside experience thresholds, technical competencies, and interpersonal traits.
This study develops the concept of qualification schemas to capture how industries organize and weight multiple signals when defining eligibility for entry-level analytical roles. Rather than treating education as a standalone signal, the project conceptualizes recruitment criteria as structured configurations that bundle credentials, skills, and experience into evaluative frameworks.
Drawing on job postings collected from applicant tracking system (ATS) APIs and structured manual collection, the analysis compares technology, finance, consulting, and healthcare industries while focusing preliminary comparisons on technology and finance. By distinguishing task descriptions from qualification criteria and operationalizing multidimensional evaluative structures within postings, the study provides a systematic approach to measuring demand-side evaluation.
Preliminary evidence suggests cross-industry variation in how formal education, experience, and technical skills are combined to define qualification for analytically comparable roles. Rather than examining hiring outcomes, the analysis maps upstream evaluation structures that shape access to elite labor markets.