Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Employment instability is central to research on social stratification, yet existing measures treat it as an absolute attribute of individuals---a quantity of disruption evaluated independent of context. This paper argues that employment instability is also relational: its consequences depend on how far a trajectory deviates from the prevailing employment pattern within a cohort. Using large language model embeddings to represent employment histories as text, I introduce trajectory atypicality---distance from the cohort-specific centroid in embedding space---as a measure of relational employment instability. Analyzing NLSY79 and NLSY97 data, I find that aggregate employment trajectory distributions are similar across cohorts, but this stability masks a gender-specific reorganization: women's employment trajectories converge toward the cohort center while men's dispersion increases. Wage penalties for absolute employment instability remain stable and gender-symmetric across cohorts. By contrast, penalties for relational employment instability are sharply gender-differentiated in the older cohort but converge in the younger cohort as men's penalties intensify to match women's. This study shows that relational employment instability thus constitutes a distinct and increasingly consequential axis of wage stratification---one that existing measures do not capture.