Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Professional choices in elite educational settings are simultaneously expressive and strategic, yet they unfold under conditions very different from the leisure-based cultural practices that dominate research on cultural homophily. This study examines how law students’ specialization choices shape friendship network formation. Using complete network data from 171 first-year JD students at an elite law school, I develop a multidimensional framework distinguishing behavioral similarity (overlapping choices), positional similarity (shared placement within mainstream versus marginal specializations), and meaning-based similarity (shared value orientations). Exponential random graph models show that simple behavioral overlap exhibits only modest associations with tie formation. Instead, two mechanisms emerge as stronger predictors: alignment in moral-oriented versus market-oriented professional commitments, and shared positioning within the institutional hierarchy of specializations. These patterns persist after controlling for structural network effects and demographic homophily. The findings demonstrate that in high-stakes professional contexts, network homophily operates primarily through shared meanings and institutional positions rather than behavioral overlap alone.
KEYWORDS: cultural homophily; social networks; professional socialization; elite education; ERGMs