Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
With the advent of the “Dear Colleague” letter from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights in 2010, institutions of higher education began the process of reconceptualizing their Title IX processes to address a diversity of sexual victimizations on college campuses. In this paper I discuss the evolution of Title IX for universities in relation to sexual victimization, highlighting shifts in definitions, victims, offenders, and responsible parties. Using highly publicized cases of university responses to sexual assault after 2010, I analyze competing discourses of blame, responsibility, and response presented by universities and victims as both struggle to invoke a discrimination framework and language to deal with sexual victimization. In particular, using feminist critiques I call into question the development of an umbrella understanding of campus sexual victimization as “sexual misconduct,” a term that both generalizes and negates the violence so prevalent on today’s college campuses.