Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
For most retentionist countries, murder has been one of the major crimes subject to the death penalty. China is no exception. What is exceptional in the Chinese law regarding the death penalty is its distinction between death with immediate execution and suspended death sentence. While the death penalty has been used by the Chinese government as a tool to suppress crimes, suspended death sentence is designed for criminals who have committed a crime so serious that warrants the death penalty; yet immediate execution is deemed unnecessary. Recent legal reforms in China attempted to formalize and standardize judicial decision-making, particularly with regard to death sentence decisions. Drawing on Supreme Court’s Interpretations, guiding cases, and other judicial judgment documents in murder cases, this paper examines the changing criteria for death sentences with or without immediate execution, and how these new legal criteria have been interpreted and implemented in murder cases. The paper discusses the complex yet unique nature of judicial decision-making process in China, and speculates on the possible role of the suspended death sentence on the abolitionist movement in China.
Hong Lu, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Yudu Li, Sam Houston State University
Bin Liang, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa