Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
California's Proposition 8 was a landmark case in the struggle surrounding marriage equality, and provides a unique opportunity to explore constructions of this contested issue and the courts' role in resolving it. This paper examines the discourse surrounding California's Proposition 8 as it moved through the court process. Specifically, it analyzes text in 128 documents from three newspapers to identify dominant frames and how these frames evolve through the time period of interest. We find dominant frames of marriage as a civil rights issue, Proposition 8 as discrimination, issues of legal standing, the courts as exceeding their authority, and the role of voters in changing laws and the constitution.
Samantha Cook, University of Cincinnati
Deirdre Warren, Kent State University at Stark
Kyla Campbell, Bowling Green State University