Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Although motivational interviewing (MI) is regarded as an effective technique to address substance use, very few studies have examined how this approach affects substance use or treatment initiation in the criminal justice system. In this paper, we present outcome data from substance using probationers who were randomized to receive a 2-session MI intervention, a 2-session motivational computer intervention (MAPIT), or probation as usual. We present data from 295 probationers who completed baseline and a 2-month follow up. Controlling for adherence to the MI protocol, those who received MI were significantly less likely to report substance use (binge alcohol, marijuana, or hard drugs) at the 2-month follow-up, compared to usual care. Both the MI and MAPIT study arms were less likely to use marijuana at 2 months, compared to usual care. Furthermore, both study arms were more likely to attend some type of treatment during the 60 days following randomization. At 6 months, most of the between group effects had disappeared. Implications for probation intake processes are suggested.
Faye S. Taxman, George Mason University
Scott T. Walters, University of North Texas Health Science Center
Jennifer Lerch, George Mason University