Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Despite extensive research and debate over the effects of proactive policing strategies, little is actually known about the realities of proactive work in American police agencies beyond their reports of minor arrests, which represent an incomplete and biased picture of proactivity. This presentation will provide results from a national survey of U.S. police agencies, conducted by George Mason University in cooperation with the International Association of Crime Analysts, to more fully understand the extent to which agencies are proactive, the types of proactive work agencies engage in, and the capacity of agencies to measure proactivity. To this end, the survey is examining agency tracking and measurement of proactive activities such as vehicle and pedestrian stops, directed patrols, community and offender contacts, problem-solving, and other crime prevention efforts. The survey is also examining how agencies direct and manage these efforts. Implications will be considered for research, policy, and police management.
Christopher Koper, George Mason University
Cynthia Lum, George Mason University
Xiaoyun Wu, George Mason University
Megan Stoltz, George Mason University
William Dean Johnson, George Mason University
Noah Fritz, Tempe Police Department