Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
Although prior research has established the stigma of a criminal record as a central barrier to reentry, most accounts treat this stigma as flat and uniformly applied. This article advances the concept of criminal classification disaggregation to show how prison yard discharge status stratifies reentry trajectories through layered and audience-dependent stigma. Drawing on 62 in-depth interviews with formerly incarcerated men in California, I examine how discharge from general population is deemed “honorable,” while parole from Sensitive Needs Yards (SNYs) or “50/50” yards is branded “dishonorable.” These labels, forged in prison hierarchies, travel into communities and shape access to family support, housing, employment, and credibility with peers. Honorable discharges often enable community embrace and even serve as a basis for “credible messenger” work, yet paradoxically may bar individuals from schools or reentry programs precisely because their credibility rests on proximity to prison politics. Dishonorable discharges, by contrast, frequently precipitate ostracism, threats of violence, and geographic exile. Findings demonstrate how Wacquant’s “deadly symbiosis” extends as prison logics diffuse into neighborhoods, workplaces, and institutions far removed from incarceration. By reframing the “mark of a criminal record” as fractured rather than monolithic, this study underscores how stigma is negotiated, disaggregated, and continually managed in reentry.