Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Committee or SIG
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keywords
Browse By Geographic Descriptor
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
More than any other historical figure, Marc-Antoine Jullien of Paris has been considered the ‘Father’ of Comparative Education, and his Esquisse d’un ouvrage sur l’éducation compare, appearing in 1816-17, has been viewed as that field’s originating source. Yet, the view that Jullien is the first in his field, and that his Esquisse is the field’s foundational work, is open to doubt. The issues of Jullien’s pre-eminence can be explored by means of a variety of approaches. This paper examines challenges to Jullien’s pre-eminence in the pantheon of founding comparativists by addressing several sets of questions. First, is Jullien the first comparativist of education? Did Juillien have predecessors or, for that matter, successors with equal or greater claim to that status? Second, did Jullien set the binding path for Comparative Education, or did he set just one among several normative paths? Third, is the issue of Jullien’s pre-eminence tied to a common definition of Comparative Education? Or, do varying definitions of the field produce various assessments of Jullien’s pre-eminence? Finally, this paper proposes criteria for discerning the origins of Comparative Education in an effort to address the aforementioned questions.