Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Committee or SIG
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keywords
Browse By Geographic Descriptor
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Much of publicly-funded – ‘government school’ – education in India is lived out in between the “all pass” rules of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009, and the high-stakes Board Exam in class 10 that gatekeeps entry into higher education. While RTE guarantees that ‘all [students] pass,’ irrespective of their exam-performance in the first eight years of schooling, the ‘Board Exam’ in class 10 is an altogether different beast: not only sorting students into preferred ‘science groups’ in higher education but – for students failing to achieve a 35% passing-score – marking the end of their schooling. How do students and teachers experience, make sense of and respond to this jarring shift from all-pass classrooms to Board Exam-driven, high-stakes classrooms?
We offer a view from two government schools in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu – one rural, the other urban – that serve marginalized populations with significant numbers of resource-poor and SC/ST (Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe) households. A view, in particular, from the lives of twenty deliberately-selected ‘focal’ students in class 9, whom we followed on their return to school in 2021 (after 18 months of pandemic-related closures) and as they moved up into class 10 in 2022. Drawing on focal student observations and interviews – and on school and classroom observations as well as interviews with teachers, parents and policy-makers – we describe and unpack the “magic” of class 10.
This “magic” – quite distinct from the narratives of stress/anxiety/pressure that have predominated scholarly work on Board Exams in India – refers, in the first instance, to frequently proclaimed beliefs, shared by students and teachers (and parents), that a new world of “serious” education appears the moment class 10 commences. Marked by new ritual performances (extra-classes, handwriting-exercises, weekly-tests, study-groups, evening-tuitions, guide-books, “revision-revision-revision,” 35%-focus) and rules (no cell-phones for students, no TV-watching for parents and no ‘official-work’ teachers in class 10), this “magic,” we demonstrate, both sustains and is sustained by a resource-shift. School infrastructure (the best classrooms and instructional resources, for instance), teachers’ time and attention, and parental investment all tend to be funneled towards and focused on the Board Exam classes – not only performing the “magic” of class 10 but, in its shadow, producing the non-magic, meagrely-resourced and learning-poor classrooms leading up to it.
It is such class 10 “magic,” we argue, that perniciously reframes a narrow, exam-focused education as ‘relevant,’ in particular, to future (educational and employment) opportunity. In the process, not only sustaining magical-thinking among students, teachers and parents about aspirational futures in white-collar employment, but disappearing from view the persistent under-funding of government schools, further exacerbated by post-pandemic pressures of rising student enrolment and widespread ‘learning losses’ (ASER, 2021; RTE Forum, 2021; APU 2021).