Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Committee or SIG
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keywords
Browse By Geographic Descriptor
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Group Submission Type: Formal Panel Session
In responding to the theme of CIES 2024, this panel engages one of the questions of Sub-theme 3 (Theories, Methodologies and Protest): How can/do we understand contestation, resistance, struggle, defiance, and compliance in education work, specifically in policy development, theoretical approaches, and research methodologies? The four presentations seek to inspire critical analysis about how work related to gender is conceptualized and engaged in education. Specifically, the presentations consider the reification and dominance of statistics and quantitative methods (paper #1); argue the value of using narrative, ethnographic, and mixed methods approaches that reveal contextual complexities (paper #2); unpack understandings of “gender” in the SDGs and propose a humanities-informed framework (paper #3); and unpack the discursive framings of how girls’ education is conceptualized in policy and therefore acted upon (paper #4). The premise of the panel is to explore dimensions of our work that have potential for transformative practice.
This work is relevant as it helps those in the field to critically consider important issues, ways of thinking about them, and possibilities for acting. It seeks to push the field forward. The presentations each engage a particular theoretical lens, conceptual ideas, or policy discourse analysis to probe more deeply the intersection of gender and education globally. The fourth CIES criteria about implications for future critique of practice, policy, or theory is exactly what the panel will be doing – engaging the audience and people in the gender/education field, and specifically girls’ education, in critiquing practice and policy through tools related to theory and methodologies.
The originality of this work is evident in the approaches of each researcher and of each paper, which moves beyond the status quo and builds on scholarly work that has been developing for decades, but is at a point of limited scope, as explained in the paper descriptions above (e.g., using only some types of data to determine policy, not fully understanding how discourse shapes thinking and action, etc.).
Challenging the excessive demand for generating statistics to report on girls’ education - Shirley J Miske, Miske Witt & Associates International
“I used to wonder why girls do not study”: Narrative techniques, mixed-methods gender/education research, & tensions in Pakistani youth’ lives - Nancy Pellowski Wiger, Miske Witt & Associates International; Khuzama Rizwan Khan, GIRL RISING; Acacia Nikoi, Miske Witt and Associates International; Aditi Ashok Arur, Christ University; Kristeen Chachage, Independent Consultant; Nidhi Shukla, Girl Rising
Gender transformed education: A framework for enacting the sustainable development goals - Jan Westrick, Valparaiso University
When progress needs a push: Making our work in girls’ education matter more - Karen Monkman, DePaul University