Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Committee or SIG
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keywords
Browse By Geographic Descriptor
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The changing education platform throughout 2020-2025 has created both challenges and opportunities for higher education across countries. Therefore, the paper looks at this current and fast-changing issue in terms of reconsidering quality of education.
To start with, the unexpected breakout, rise and spread of Covid-19 have acted as shock waves in different realms of activity all over the world. Almost all education institutions, both schools and universities, have been forced to adapt their operations, study programs and methods of instruction from face-to-face to on-line mode in a very short period of time.
In certain aspects, it has been even felt that the pace at which education institutions managed to switch from face-to-face to on-line style of instruction has served as an indicator of success, and hence high quality, of any specific institution. This adaptability has been perceived as a kind of quality-indicator across education institutions.
However, the changing education platform throughout 2020-2022 has created both challenges and opportunities for higher education across countries. Therefore, this current and fast-changing issue in terms of reconsidering quality of education is also significant across regions.
On the one hand, it could be argued that introducing on-line classes across the world has created opportunities for students to join the courses at their desirable universities from different countries and from different parts of the world. The easy access to electronic resources and study materials, to video recordings of classes or to live on-line streaming of lectures has facilitated the spread of education all over the world. This fact, in itself, has opened up possibilities for students to obtain certificates, diplomas, credits, degrees and qualifications based on on-line assessments and evaluations.
On the other hand, the on-line access to education requires certain IT equipment and the availability of the internet, which is not always provided in economically disadvantaged parts of the world. This fact puts number of students at a disadvantage relative to others.
Besides, the quality of on-line instruction has become questionable, especially regarding examinations, tests and various types of assessments. This in its turn, has put the validity of credentials, degrees and diplomas under scrutiny in certain contexts. Especially, if quality is associated with global rankings, it acquires high stakes and makes on-line instruction debatable.
Therefore, while expanding internationalization through on-line instruction, universities need to consider and revisit the assessment and evaluation issues that constitute important part of quality of education. Therefore, these on-line adjustments have had double-sided effects on education institutions.
Moving further step ahead, the organizations and websites involved in university ranking procedures need to re-consider the criteria of assessing university standings and include the item of high on-line adaptability without losing the quality instruction before publishing further university ranking lists on-line.
Besides, looking at the language that university websites use to attract prospective students is also interesting to identify the quality and adaptability indicators that are usually implemented in this case. This has become particularly important again over the past several years, since the majority of students have started referring to university websites for extracting the necessary information about the standing and quality of universities.
The methodologies implemented in the present research were qualitative analysis of questionnaires and survey results. The questionnaires were sent out on-line to administrative and academic staffs of various universities, as well as to the students of the same universities. The universities of the U.S., western and eastern Europe were most frequently approached. The questionnaires asked about the perceptions of quality of education, about the connection of quality of education with internationalization and on-line adaptability, as well as expectations and disappointments with education that certain students had regarding education programs.
Besides, the content analysis of university websites was conducted to identify the linguistic and extra-linguistic units implemented by the universities to describe the quality of academic life at their institutions and to attract the students.
Approximately 59 academic and administrative staff were approached, and about 145 students. Also, the websites of 25 universities were analysed.
The paper finds that in a number of cases quality of instruction is closely associated with internationalisation and consequently, with global university rankings. This fact implies reconsideration of study programs, innovative teaching approaches, incorporation of new methodologies and technologies in the instruction process, developing more creative and flexible skills in students and making them globally competitive and employable. International recognition of the programs and universities goes hand in hand with this process and aims at the inclusion of universities in the global rankings.
Furthermore, on-line adaptability and high IT proficiency have become vividly important throughout the pandemic period and educators have started addressing the global accessibility issues worldwide. Therefore, the present research states that these adaptability and flexibility components should be included in the university ranking criteria as one of the significant quality indicators.