Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Despite numerous research on public attributions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and subsequent responses, the question of how publics perceive CSR communications as a bolstering crisis response strategy remains partially unaddressed. Based on the integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) with the Persuasion Knowledge Model (PKM), we conduct an experiment with a 2 (topic knowledge - crisis type: accidental vs. preventable) x 2 (persuasion knowledge - CSR attributions: values-driven vs. strategic-driven) x 2 (agent knowledge – leadership styles: transformational vs. transactional) design. Results show main and interaction effects on dependent variables such as crisis responsibility perceptions, attitudes toward the company, and behavioral intentions. We highlight a significant role of public inferences of CSR attributions and leadership styles in responding to a company’s crisis response strategy. Theoretical and practical implications will be discussed.