Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
When “bathroom bills” restricting transgender persons’ access to public toilets entered U.S. politics in 2015, the debate quickly spiraled along partisan lines. More insidious, was the presence of benevolent sexism, or the belief that women must be protected. This study delineates the benevolently sexist themes in the debate through a framing analysis of 8,841 online comments on the most circulated articles about transgender persons’ public toilet access between September 2015 and September 2016. While opponents of gender-neutral bathrooms viewed men as unable to contain their sexual desires, supporters argued that women are more likely to be sexually objectified or assaulted outside of public toilets. Both sides re-emphasized a centuries-old script of sexual assault as women’s problem. Our findings suggest a pervasive shifting of the debate from the human rights of transgender persons to the protection of women, without recognizing the patriarchal substructures oppressing women and transgender individuals.
Lindsey Erin Blumell, City University London
Jennifer Huemmer, Texas Tech U
Miglena Mantcheva Sternadori