Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Panel
A growing number of ordinary objects are being redesigned to include digital sensors, computing power, and communication capabilities – and new objects, and processes, are becoming part of the Internet. This emerging Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem – networks of physical objects embedded with the ability to sense, and sometimes act upon, their environment, as well as related communication, applications, and data analysis, enables data to be collected from billions of everyday objects. The emerging datasphere made possible by these developments offers immense potential to serve the public good by fostering government transparency, energy conservation, participatory governance, and substantial advances in medical research and care. On the other hand, a growing body of research addresses emerging privacy and civil liberties concerns related to big data, including unjust discrimination and unequal access to data and the tools needed to make use of it.
For example, big data analytics may reveal patterns that were previously not detectable. Data about a variety of daily tasks that seem trivial is increasingly being federated and used to reveal associations or behaviors, and these analyses and the decisions made based on them pose potential harms to individuals or groups. Many transactions that seemed innocuous can now be used to discriminate – one’s movement throughout the day, items purchased at the store, television programs watched, “friends” added or looked at on social networks, or individuals communicated with or who were in close proximity to the subject at various times, can all be used to make judgements that affect an individual and his or her life chances. With the advent of artificial intelligence and machine learning, we are increasingly moving to a world where many decisions around us are shaped by these calculations rather than traditional human judgement. For example, sensitive personal information or behaviors (e.g., political or health-related) may be used to discriminate when individuals seek housing, immigration eligibility, medical care, education, bank loans or other financial services, insurance, or employment. At the same time, individuals, groups, or regions may also be disadvantaged due to a lack of access to data (or related skills and tools) to make use of big data in ways that benefit their lives and communities.
This preconference session seeks to advance understanding of digital inequalities and discrimination related to big data and big data analytics. Papers between 5,000-8,000 words and position papers between 1,000-2,000 words are welcomed.
Jenifer Sunrise Winter, U of Hawaii at Manoa
Nyle Kauweloa, U of Hawaii - Manoa
Wayne Buente, U of Hawaii - Manoa
Consumers on the Internet: Unanimously Indifferent or Merely Unaware About Digital Inequalities? - René Arnold, Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste; Anna Schneider, Fresenius U of Applied Sciences; Johanna Bott, Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste
An Analysis of China’s Big Data Policy: An Ecosystem Approach - Yang Bai, Pennsylvania State U
AI, Discrimination, and Inequality in the ‘Post’ Classification Era - Anja Bechmann, Aarhus U; Geoffrey Bowker, University of California - Irvine
Disclosure Requirements for Use of Big Data in Employment - Mark A. Cenite, Nanyang Technological U
A Proposal to Adopt Data Discrimination Rather Than Privacy as the Legal Justification for Rolling Back U.S. Government Surveillance - Benjamin W. Cramer, Pennsylvania State U
Democratic Implications of the Use of Big Data: Public Interest Groups and Communications Regulation in the UK - Jelena Dzakula, U of Westminster
Emotional Labor in Authoritarian Internet Governance: The Surveillance of Chinese Internet Public Opinion and its Commercialization - Rui Hou, Queen’s U; Mengjun Guo
Social Ontology in Big Data Organizing - Andrew Iliadis, Temple U
Health Wearables: Ensuring Fairness, Preventing Discrimination, and Promoting Equity in an Emerging Internet-of-Things Environment - Kathryn C. Montgomery, American U
Big Data as a New Economic Pageant: How the Discourse Of Economic Growth Deepens Digital Inequality in South Korea - Siho Nam, U of North Florida
Autoethnography as an Approach for Scholarly Inquiry on Big Data Inequalities - Chamil Rathnayake, Middlesex U
Privacy and Prejudice in Big Data: Algorithms Can Discriminate on the Basis of Data They Lack - Betsy Williams, U of Arizona/Center for Digital Society and Data Studies; Volodymyr Lysenko, U of Arizona/Center for Digital Society and Data Studies; Catherine F. Brooks, U of Arizona; Yotam Shmargad, U of Arizona