Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The current study extends the literature on psychological reactance theory by examining two additional antecedents to psychological reactance: choice clustering and descriptive norms. Participants (N = 455) were randomly assigned to view one of four print ads in a 2 (choice clustering: choice or no choice) x 2 (descriptive norm: high vs. low) between subjects factorial design. Results indicated that provision of choice (vs. no choice) in a behavioral cluster decreased freedom threat perceptions. Descriptive norms (high vs. low) were unrelated to freedom threat, but did influence behavioral intention as mediated through perceived descriptive norms. Furthermore, state reactance was negatively associated with perceived descriptive norms. Evidence in support of the intertwined model of reactance, and modeling reactance as a two-step process, was also found. Findings are discussed in terms of the theoretical and practical contributions of the current study.
Tobias Reynolds-Tylus, U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Andrea Gonzalez Martinez, U of Illinois - Urbana Champaign
Brian L. Quick, U of Illinois- Urbana-Champaign