Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Track
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This paper examines to what extent policy responses to the financial crisis of 2001/2002 constitute a coherent shift from neoliberalism to a neo-developmentalism in Argentina between 2002 and 2007.The post-crisis political economy of Argentina was conceptualized as part of a wider trend in Latin America as the region saw a resurgence of the Left-wing governments.In the past decade, this prompted a debate about a return to local ideas of developmentalism and the state`s centrality in economic management and welfare in the region. Argentina`s post-crisis political economy was framed as “neo-desarrollismo” (Grugel and Riggirozzi, 2007), “open-economy nationalism” (Riggirozzi, 2009), “developmental regime” (Wylde, 2012).
Using the framework of “new developmentalism” labelled by Bresser-Pereira in 2003, I argue that neo-developmentalism in Argentina embodies a more hybrid and complex process that maintained core elements of economic liberalism. This paper suggests that Argentina`s post-crisis political economy should be understood in the form of evolving balances between states and markets under a globalised market activity which has changed the costs and benefits of integration into the global economy.