Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Content Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
LRA Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This interpretive case study examines public debate about a test-based third-grade retention policy in Tennessee, which mandated retention based on state standardized test results. Using a data corpus of 23 legislative hearings, school board meetings, and community actions, we drew on qualitative and discourse analysis to analyze how the policy was framed by opponents and proponents, tracing how proponents were able to effectively reframe the opponent’s critiques about the use of high-stakes literacy testing.