A Qualitative Conundrum: Theory Testing, Case Studies, and the Reification of Groupthink

• In Event: Flawed Processing: Inaccuracy, Irrationality and Delusional Processes in Social Cognition

Abstract

This paper considers whether groupthink has become reified, ignoring non-confirming findings that emerge using experimental methods and over-relying on supportive case studies. A study is provided to examine how retrospective sense-making could influence qualitative scholars engaged in theory testing in case studies. Data is derived to determine if individuals overestimate some groupthink symptoms (i.e., mindguards, pressure to conform, self censorship) when they perceive a group is making a bad decision. The results support retrospective sensemaking.

Authors

• David Henningsen, Northern Illinois University

• Mary Lynn Henningsen, Northern Illinois University

• Betty La France, Northern Illinois University

• Emily McWorthy, Northern Illinois University