Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

The Biopolitical Child

Thu, March 30, 5:30 to 7:00pm, Palmer House Hilton, Floor: Seventh Floor, LaSalle 3

Abstract

Does it make sense to speak of an early modern biopolitics? If so, which models, what subjects, and what objects of analysis make sense? In this paper, I consider the figure of the child not only as a primary interlocutor with respect to notions of sovereignty but also as a uniquely dense node for the politicization of life in early modernity. I test out and revise a variety of biopolitical notions—population, security, bare life, immunity—with respect to the early modern child. With reference to the unusually child-filled works of William Shakespeare, I find in the child a primary figure of the corporeal transfer of sovereign perpetuity, the intended recipient of the humanizing technology of humanist educational thought, an instance of population (not the people), a primary figure associated with risk, precarity, and political futurity, and an instance of what I refer to as maximal and minimal instances of life.

Author