Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Introduction
[The digital reading resource] is an adaptive, software-as-a-service Instructional Content Platform in use by more than 15 million students and 1.4 million teachers in U.S. classrooms aims to improve comprehension, vocabulary, and motivation outcomes for students in grades 3-12 by providing: 1) high-interest nonfiction content that’s accessible for everyone; 2) a library of content that covers a wide range of topics to motivate readers of all ages and ethnic groups; 3) texts at an appropriate reading level with a rich vocabulary; and 4) the ability for teachers, parents, and students to review progress in a timely, actionable way.
Hypothesis
The research team conducted an independent evaluation of [The digital reading resource] to determine whether students who used [The digital reading resource] twice a week for a minimum of 12 weeks would see an increase in reading proficiency over a control group of students receiving business-as-usual instruction.
Study Population
The sample was comprised of 1,238 5th grade students (53% male, 47% female) and 63 teachers in two large, diverse districts in CA and FL. The race/ethnicity of the sample included: 4% Asian, 21% Black, 13% Latino, 32% White, and 27% other. The majority (53%) of the sample had a home language of English, while 38% and 5% spoke Spanish or another language respectively.
Methods
For the efficacy study, a true, group-randomized, experimental design was used to control for most threats to internal validity (Cook & Campbell, 1979; Murray, 1998) where teachers were randomly assigned into treatment (access to Newsela, n=32) and control (business-as-usual English Language Arts instruction, n=31) conditions. The study relied on hierarchical modeling techniques to determine whether the Newsela intervention treatment was more effective than business-as-usual for improving reading proficiency on the STAR Reading Assessment and the Motivation to Read Survey. Student demographics (i.e., gender, ethnicity, and EL status) and student baseline reading comprehension and motivation were included as moderators of interest. For the formative research study, additional data were collected via teacher interviews with a select sample of 10 treatment teachers and surveys of all participating teachers from both conditions in order to make recommendations regarding usability, feasibility and social validity.
Results
When we compared the control group to the treatment group, students who used [The digital reading resource] at recommended dosage saw an additional growth of 113% in size compared to the BAU group. A small percentage of students (6%) used [The digital reading resource] daily, and they saw an additional 255% growth in reading comprehension when compared to the BAU group.
The effect for the Motivation to Read Profile was consistently positive, particularly in FL where effect sizes ranged from 0.19 to 0.24. In the formative study, teacher interviews and surveys revealed that teachers’ philosophies and district standards around reading instruction aligned with [The digital reading resource]’s theoretical framework.