Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Browse Posters
Search Tips
Register for SRCD23
Personal Schedule
Welcome Letter
Program Guide
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, children and their caregivers have to navigate through changing governmental public health restrictions such as lockdowns. However, there is little empirical evidence on which pre-pandemic psychological factors support families in dealing with lockdown-related stress. From a bidirectional, transactional viewpoint (e.g., Essler et al., 2021; Neece et al., 2012), caregiver pre-pandemic emotional availability might support child psychological well-being during lockdowns (Masten et al., 2021, Thompson et al., 2022). Furthermore, child pre-pandemic socio-emotional competencies might facilitate caregivers’ dealing with stress during lockdowns (Sun et al., 2022). The present study aimed to uncover if and to what extent (1) pre-pandemic caregiver emotional availability (i.e., sensitivity and structuring; EA-scales, Biringen, 2008) predicted lower lockdown-related child stress, (2) pre-pandemic child competencies (i.e., prosocial behavior, Svetlova et al., 2010; and behavioral compliance with caregiver requests, Kochanska, 2002) predicted lower lockdown-related maternal stress, and (3) pre-pandemic caregiver and child competencies predicted lower lockdown-related negativity in the mother-child relationship.
To that end, we tested 122 mothers-child dyads of largely middle to high socioeconomic status (63,92% university degree, 13,40% technical college, 11,34% vocational training) in a large city in Western Europe. Pre-pandemic variables were assessed at child age 18 months (M = 18.50 days; SD = 0.33 days). Maternal sensitivity and structuring were measured using the Emotional Availability Scales (Biringen, 2008) through coding free-play interactions between mother and child. Child emotional helping was measured via a task where children could alleviate another’s emotional distress by bringing her a targeted object (e.g., a scarf when someone was freezing; Svetlova et al., 2010). Child compliance behavior was measured in a task where the mother was instructed to ask the child to put spilled toys back into a toy box (Kochanska et al., 2002). In addition, we assessed child stress (5 items; e.g., “My child is frustrated in the current situation”), maternal stress (6 items, e.g., “I feel burdened by the current situation”), and the negativity in the mother-child relationship (5 items, e.g., “There is more conflict between me and my child compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic”) during the first COVID-19 related lockdown at child age 24 months (M = 23.05 months, SD = 2.17 months) in the spring of 2020 via maternal report. All analyses controlled for child pre-pandemic temperamental negativity.
Results showed that (1) maternal sensitivity and structuring did not significantly predict child stress although maternal sensitivity went into the hypothesized direction of predicting lower child stress, b = -0.210, se = 0.129, z = -1.627, p = 0.104, (2) child prosociality (but not behavioral compliance) predicted lower maternal stress, b = -0.204, se = 0.091, z = -2.247, p = 0.025, and that (3) maternal sensitivity predicted lower negativity in the mother-child relationship, b = -0.348, se = 0.158, z = -2.198, p = 0.028. These findings are the first to demonstrate that caregiver emotional availability and child socio-emotional competencies prior to a sociohistorical disruption constitute resilience factors that work together to foster family psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.