Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Traditional (Closed) Panel
Scholarship in STS and related fields have done much to move beyond what philosopher Alfred North Whitehead labeled the “fallacy of misplaced concreteness”—the tendency to conflate reified abstractions with their concrete referents. In the wake of the material turn, scholars have moved beyond the assumption that abstractions adequately capture the nuances of knowledge and experience. They attend to techniques of representations, practices of exchange, and socio-technical arrangements. Yet such studies have replaced analyses of ascension with declension, thereby preserving the abstract-concrete opposition. Calls for abandoning and moving beyond this dualism have spread far and wide. We draw on “things that talk,” “intangible things,” “material semiotics,” and “epistemic objects” as labels to capture the in-between of dualistic dichotomies. This panel draws on “misplaced concreteness" as a provocation to work with these in-between labels, shelving binary categories and studying how such categories strengthened at certain moments. We interrogate their sudden juxtapositions and overlaps from the perspective of two complementary and intersecting disciplinary lenses: the mathematical sciences and design. Breaking from empirical traditions invested in material concreteness, designers enlist mathematical abstraction for purposes that range from epistemological consolidation to aesthetic renewal. At the same time, mathematical practitioners draw from aesthetic and material resources to reason with, teach, or communicate the abstractions with which they operate. We ask how abstraction engages with existing socio-technical arrangements in both planned and unplanned ways, facilitating both collaborations and contestations. Ultimately, this panel recasts “misplaced concreteness” as a productive process, bearing analytical and critical potential for STS.
Architecture and the Algorithm, or: What Happens When Abstract Art Meets Concrete Poetry? - Matthew Allen, Harvard University
Global Translation, Oriental Spaces: The Work of Abstracting Eastern Aesthetics in 20th-Century American Mathematics - Clare Kim
Plexes and Patches: Ambivalent Artifacts of Computer-Aided Design - Daniel Cardoso Llach, Carnegie Mellon University
Midcentury Mathematics and Aesthetic Autonomy - Alma Steingart, Harvard University
Graphs as Designs: The Concreteness of Mathematical Abstraction in 1960s Design Theory - Theodora Vardouli