Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Research Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
STS and Anthropology have explored infrastructures empirically, theoretically, and conceptually for several decades now, but what, if anything, comes after infrastructure? The times where the internet was considered a space of flows have certainly come to an end, current developments in Europe make many kinds of borders visible, and there certainly are new obstacles to the sharing of knowledge and exchange of thought. Even the diversity of infrastructural forms seems to be diminishing, leading to more uniform set of shared interfaces and platforms. Infrastructure studies have focused attention on how people, things and knowledge circulate, and on the transformations that happen as they do. Infrastructure studies have coined invisible work, installed base, ontological experiment and described blockages to flow. Thus, infrastructure studies are about circulation, formalization, scaling up and flow as well as transformation and obstacles. As such it is a rich tradition that speaks to a host of empirical fields. But given that almost anything can now count as infrastructure, has the concept lost some of its precision? In this panel we will discuss this question and think about what might be the limits to and enduring potential of the concept of infrastructure to speaks to empirical, theoretical and political challenges of today.
Cutting the Infrastructure: How Electric Vehicles Survive in Laos - Miki Namba, Hitotsubashi University
What Does the French Nuclear Regulatory System Learn from the 2003 Heatwave and Drought? - olivier chanton, IRSN
What is Power Storage? Inventing a Resource - Daniel Breslau, Virginia Tech
Exploring the Limits of “Institution” and “Infrastructure” in Knowledge Interactions - Gregory Leazer, UCLA Dept of Information Studies; Robert Montoya, Indiana University Bloomington