Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Research Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
There is software in our cars, ATMs, and our pockets. Code is not just an accessory for everyday life, it’s become a necessity. Through examining the literature on queer theory and code, I present a theoretically-grounded synthesis of how code can behave as conduits which propagate domination. I ground my synthesis in Haraway’s notion of the “informatics of domination”.
I argue that code can embed or amplify the informatics of domination. “Informatics of domination” acts as a representation of the “white capitalist imperialist patriarchy in its contemporary late versions” (Haraway, 2006). I argue that Haraway’s informatics of domination gives us a lens to queer how code propagates power structures in society.
In my synthesis of the literature, I incorporate how social media will reify gender through data inference (Bivens, 2017); how code can be performative and resistant toward commodity yet fail to equalize gender, breeding masculinity contest cultures (Rawski & Stark, 2018) within its communities (Nafus, 2012); and by looking at the history of code through a queer lens, we can see how queer identities could have influenced new ideas (King, 2015). I identify and discuss technologically-mediated forms of violence as a theme throughout this literature.
In its most reductive definition, code is a series of instructions which performs a task. However, I argue that code is a living object embodying different ideologies that, by its nature, circulate our world.