Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Forensic Devices: How They Mediate, How They Are Discussed, How They Mitigate Interprofessional Conflicts - II

Wed, October 6, 1:20 to 2:50pm EDT (1:20 to 2:50pm EDT), 4S 2021 Virtual, 20

Abstract

The term “forensics” derives from the Latin word "forensis" meaning "belonging to the forum, market (place)". The etymology recalls that court proceedings and investigations are public affairs and so they were often conducted on the Forum in ancient Rome.
Following this line of thought, several STS works have depicted how experts present forensic findings in the courtroom, explain their evidence and put them up for evaluation. Recent papers have then turned to the epistemic foundations of forensic science. In our panel we want to take up these discussions and push them in a new direction. For while the relationship between forensics and law is already well studied, the intersections of forensics and the society/public, forensics and basic science, and forensics and the police have hardly been explored so far. We propose to take a closer look at these relations by using the example of forensic devices. By forensic devices we do not only mean machines and tools, but also databases, information technologies, and procedures guiding forensic practices. We are looking for studies dedicated to the social life of forensic devices, to their role as mediators or boundary objects between different areas and fields of practice, as well as the public debate about their trustworthiness, risks and chances. We particularly encourage contributions focussing on how these devices help their users to navigate the gap between – and the quest for loyalty to – the realm of investigation on the one hand and the realm of science on the other.

Chair

Individual Presentations

Session Organizer