Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
Registration / Membership
Hotel Accommodations
Media A/V Equipment
Gender Neutral Bathrooms
ASA Home
Future Annual Meetings
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Nineteenth-century cookbooks usually contained a chapter on recipes for feeding infants and invalids. Soft, liquid, and bland, these foods aimed to nourish the bodies of babies, weaning toddlers, and people with chronic illnesses or disabilities, and to keep from “overstimulating” them with dangerous spices or flavors. But what connections did nineteenth-century Americans draw between infancy, chronic illness, and disability? Was infancy an illness? Was disability infantilizing? By the turn of the twentieth century, bottle-fed babies died by the thousands from adulterated milk supplies or the contamination of impossible-to-clean “murder bottles.” As Progressive-era reformers pushed to optimize the health of white babies, their campaigns malnourished children of color, forced people with disabilities into institutions, and created an obsession with “normal” children’s growth and development that continues to this day. This paper interrogates these slippages between infancy and disability while placing the feeding of infants and invalids in the contexts of the growing fields of public health, pediatrics, and eugenics in the late nineteenth century, which also saw the marketing of the first industrially produced baby foods and racial panics over immigration, imperialism, and Jim Crow.